PortfoliosLab logo
^SSMI vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^SSMI and ^GSPC is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

^SSMI vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swiss Market Index (^SSMI) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^SSMI:

0.27

^GSPC:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

^SSMI:

0.63

^GSPC:

0.79

Omega Ratio

^SSMI:

1.10

^GSPC:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

^SSMI:

0.39

^GSPC:

0.48

Martin Ratio

^SSMI:

1.44

^GSPC:

1.85

Ulcer Index

^SSMI:

4.66%

^GSPC:

4.92%

Daily Std Dev

^SSMI:

15.68%

^GSPC:

19.37%

Max Drawdown

^SSMI:

-56.31%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

^SSMI:

-8.20%

^GSPC:

-7.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SSMI achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SSMI has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 2.95%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.


^SSMI

YTD

4.19%

1M

7.49%

6M

2.45%

1Y

2.84%

5Y*

4.52%

10Y*

2.95%

^GSPC

YTD

-3.77%

1M

7.44%

6M

-5.60%

1Y

8.37%

5Y*

14.12%

10Y*

10.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^SSMI vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SSMI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^SSMI is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^SSMI is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^SSMI is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^SSMI is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^SSMI is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^SSMI is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^SSMI vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swiss Market Index (^SSMI) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^SSMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SSMI and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

^SSMI vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SSMI drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SSMI and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

^SSMI vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Swiss Market Index (^SSMI) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 6.85% and 6.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...